The power of short lectures to improve support for biodiversity conservation of unpopular organisms: an experiment with worms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v9i1.1690Keywords:
attitude towards invertebrates, quantitative effect of education, conservation of biodiversity, tropical worms, Epiperipatus biolleyi.Abstract
Public opinion is important in obtaining support for the conservation of biodiversity, and invertebrates have a "public relations problem" because -for reasons that are both cultural and biological- they are poorly known and often unpopular. In this article I present the results of an experiment on the power of a short lecture to improve attitude towards invertebrates, using the case of velvet worms. Velvet worms are "living fossils" that have inspired a wide range of cultural expressions, probably because of the adhesive net they use to capture prey. For the experiment, a group of 141 Costa Ricans, aged 10 to 58 years old, rated their reaction to a color photograph of Epiperipatus biolleyi, a Costa Rican species of velvet worm, before and after a five-minute lecture about the natural history of the worm. Even before the treatment, most of the respondents had a correct idea of the animal's anatomy (84%); supported the use of public funds to conserve it (71%); and more than half perceived the worm in a positive way (58%). They stated that they were willing to donate a mean of US$7,00 from their own pocket for the worm's protection (six times more if they had university education); and were less likely to reject the worm if they kept pets at home. Gender, age and education did not have any effect on most variables of attitude and knowledge. Compared with the control group, the group that received the lecture had a 17% improvement in attitude. The Costa Rican educational system, focused on nature and its conservation, can explain the generally good attitude and knowledge of invertebrates found in this study; and a five-minute natural history lecture can produce a significant improvement in perception of an animal that is generally unattractive: a worm.References
Barraza, L. (2015). Attitudes to animal dilemmas: an exploratory comparison between mexican and english children. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 5(2), 40-61.
Batt, S. (2009). Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: a multivariate approach. Bioscience Horizons, 2(2), 180-190.
Bjerke, T., & Østdahl, T. (2004). Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös, 17(2), 109-129.
Concha, A., Mellado, P., Morera-Brenes, B., Sampaio-Costa, C., Mahadevan, L., & Monge-Nájera, J. (2015). Oscillation of the velvet worm slime jet by passive hydrodynamic instability. Nature Communications, 6(6292).
Drissner, J., Simonte, M., & Hille, K. (2016). Attitudes of School Children in Germany and Costa Rica towards Invertebrates - A Comparison. Research Journal of Education, 2(3), 34-37.
Durán, M. E., Barrientos, Z., & Charpentier, C. (2016) Percepción ambiental de escolares urbanos: influencia de áreas verdes, financiamiento y sexo en Costa Rica. Revista Cuadernos de Investigación, 8(1), 31-39.
Guier Serrano, E., Morales, M. R., & Chaves, M. E. Z. (2004). Educación Ambiental en Costa Rica: tendencias evolutivas, perspectivas y desafíos. Biocenosis, 18(1-2), 2-25.
Hossler, E. W. (2010). Caterpillars and moths : Part II. Dermatologic manifestations of encounters with Lepidoptera. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 62(1), 13–28.
Kellert, S. R., & Berry, J. K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15(3), 363-371.
Kilic, S. (2013). Students’ knowledge about the internal structure of mice and cockroaches in their environment. Academic Journals, 8(19), 1797-1803.
Ministerio de Salud de Costa Rica. (2012). Memoria 2012. San José: Ministerio de Salud, chapter 4.
Monge-Nájera, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). Costa Rica Publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis for 1981-2010. Revista Biología Tropical, 60(4),1649-61.
Monge-Nájera, J., & Morera-Brenes, B. (2015). Velvet Worms (Onychophora) in Folklore and Art: Geographic Pattern, Types of Cultural Reference and Public Perception. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 10(3): 1-9.
Pontes-da-Silva, E., Tinoco Pacheco, M.L., Costa Lima Pequeno, P.A., Franklin, E., & Kaefer, I.L. (2016). Attitudes Towards Scorpions and Frogs: A Survey Among Teachers and Students from Schools in the Vicinity of an Amazonian Protected Area. Journal of Ethnobiology, 36(2), 395-411.
Prokop, P., & Francovicova, J. (2013). Does colour matter? The influence of animal warning coloration on human emotions and willingness to protect them. Animal Conservation, 16, 458–466.
Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on
children's concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30(04), 431-449.
Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2009). Effects of Having Pets at Home on Children’s Attitudes toward Popular and Unpopular Animals. Anthrozoos, 23(1), 21-34.
Randler, C., Hummel, E., & Wüst-Ackermann, P. (2013). The Influence of Perceived Disgust on Students’ Motivation and Achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2839-2856.
Schlegel, J., Breuer, G., & Rupf, R. (2015). Local Insects as Flagship Species to Promote Nature Conservation? A Survey among Primary School Children on Their Attitudes toward Invertebrates. Anthrozoös, 28(2), 229-245.
Schlegel, J., & Rupf, R. (2009). Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(4), 278–290
Wagler, R., & Wagler, A. (2012). External insect morphology: A negative factor in
attitudes toward insects and likelihood of incorporation in future science education settings. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(2), 313-325
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 UNED Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.