Comparisson of methods for the analysis of total and fecal coliforms in water samples using the Most Probable Number technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v3i2.151Keywords:
Total coliforms, fecal coliforms, water, Most Probable Number.Abstract
The basic microbiological analysis of water includes the determination of total and fecal coliforms. The presence or abscense of fecal coliforms in water defines its potability. The main objective of this work was to design and execute a comparison scheme of two techniques for the determination of coliforms in water, applying modifications to the reference technique of the Most Probable Number, derived from the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. The modifications included the type of media used for the presumptive phase and the use of an air incubator instead of a water bath for the confirmatory phase. At the same time, the effect of using calibrated automatic pipettes and calibrated glass pipettes was also compared. Artificial water samples, elaborated with standard laboratory material and inoculated with Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and environmental samples, were used. The alternative methodology shows a superior performance only when inoculation is low. There was no difference between the two volumetric systems.
References
Abbaszadegan, M. 2006.Guidelines for drinking-water quality, World Health Organization. Ginebra, Suiza.
Anderson K., J. Whitlock & V. Harwood. 2005. Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 3041-3048.
American Public Health Association. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewaters. Washington DC, EEUU.
Barrell R, C. Benton, D.Blake, P. Boyd & S. Cole. 2002. The microbiology of drinking water-Part 3-Practices and procedures for laboratories in methods for the examination of
Cuadernos de Investigación UNED (ISSN: 1659-4266) Vol. 3(2), Diciembre, 2011 225
waters and associated materials. Environment Agency, Washington DC, EEUU.
Beauchamp C., A. Simao-Beaunoir, C. Beaulieu & F. Chalifour. 2006. Confirmation of E. coli among other thermotolerant coliform bacteria in paper mill effluents, wood chips screening rejects and paper sludges. Water Research 40: 2452-2462.
Chao K., C. Chao & W. Chao. 2003. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freswater environments. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectology 36: 288-293.
Clark D., B. Milner, M.Stewart, R. Wolfe & B. Olson. 1991. Comparative study of commercial 4-Methylumbelliferyl-β-D-Glucuronide preparations with the standard methods membrane filtration fecal coliform test for the detection of Escherichia coli in water samples. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 57: 1528-1534.
Eckner K. 1998. Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in Southern Sweden. Applied Environmental Microbiology 64: 3079-3083.
Feldsine P., C. Abeyta & W. Andrews. 2002. AOAC international methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. Microbiology Guidelines. AOAC International. Maryland, EEUU.
Garcia-Armisen T., J.Prats & P. Servais. 2007. Comparison of culturable fecal colforms and Escherichia coli enumeration in freshwaters. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 53: 798-801.
International Organization for Standardisation. ISO 17994. 2004 “Criterios para el establecimiento de equivalencia entre métodos microbiológicos”. Ginebra, Suiza.
International Organization for Standardisation. ISO/TR 13843. 1996. “Guía para la validación de métodos microbiológicos en aguas”. Ginebra, Suiza
International Organization for Standardisation.ISO 16140. 2005. “Protocolo para la validación de Métodos Alternativos”. Ginebra, Suiza.
International Organization for Standardisation. INTE-ISO/IEC-17025. 2005 “Requerimientos para la competencia de los laboratorios de ensayo y calibración.” Ginebra, Suiza.
Isaac A. & C. Lezama. 1998. Sanitary quality of water for human consumption in a rural community of Mexico. Acta Científica Venezolana 49: 187-192.
McDaniels A., R. Bordner, J. Menkedick & C. Weber. 1987. Comparison of the hydrophobic-grid membrane filter procedure and standard methods for coliform analysis of water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 1003-1009.
Mercado J. & T. Hazen T. 1987. Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters. Applied Environmental Microbiology 53: 2922-2928.
Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Comercio de Costa Rica (MEIC). Decreto Nº 25018- MEIC, publicado en el Diario Oficial La Gaceta Nº 59 del 25 de marzo de 1996.
Moldenhauer J. 2005. Comparability Protocols. Rapid Microbiology Newsletter 3:3-7.
Niemela S., J. Lee & C. Fricker. 2003. A comparison of the International Standards Organisation reference method for the detection of coliforms and Escherichia coli in water with a defined substrate procedure. Journal Applied Microbiology 95: 1285-1292.
Pitkanen T., P. Paakkari, I. Miettinen, H. Heinonen-Tanski, L. Paulin & M. Hanninen. 2007. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water. Journal Microbiological Methods 68: 522-529.
Pouch F. 2001. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, EEUU.
Public Health Laboratory Service and the Standing Committee of Analysts. 1980. A comparison between minerals-modified glutamate medium and lauryl trypstose lactose broth for the enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform organisms in water by the multiple tube method. Journal of Hygiene 85: 35-49.
Sartory, D. 2005. Validation, verification and comparison: Adopting new methods in water microbiology. Water SA 31: 393-396.
Sartory D., H. Gu & C. Chen. 2008. Comparison of a novel MPN method against the yeast extract agar (YEA) pour plate method for the enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria from drinking water. Water Research 42: 3489-3497.
Weitzel M. 2007. How to meet ISO 17025. Requirements for Method Verification. AOAC International, Maryland, EEUU.
Winward G., L. Avery, T. Stephenson & B.Jefferson. 2008. Chlorine disinfection of grey water for reuse: Effects of organics and particles. Water Research 42: 483-491.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.