Environmental perception by urban school children: influence of green areas, financing and sex in Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v8i1.1220Keywords:
anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, private schools, public schools, environmental perception, environmental educationAbstract
Currently, two main environmental perceptions are recognized: anthropocentrism and ecocentrism. An ecocentric view is associated with childhood, gender and adolescence; nevertheless, there are not studies regarding the effect of school green areas and budget on environmental perception. We analyze the influence of those elements on the environmental perception of 8-9 year old children from eight urban schools in Heredia (Costa Rica). Our survey had 28 statements and questions evaluating contact with green areas, and environmental values, knowledge, attitude and behavior. Ecocentrism dominated in schools with female students or more than 30% green area (X2= 18,5; p=0,002; X2= 14,8, p=0,011). However, boys and girls are both mostly ecocentric, they differ only on the intensity. Budget and total green area were not significant. To encourage sustainable development, an ecocentric perception must be strengthened; green areas must be improved and more attention should be paid to boys’ environmental perception.
References
guilar-Luzón, M. C., Monteoliva-Sánchez, A. & García-Martínez, J. M. A. (2005). Influencia de las normas, los valores, las creencias proambientales y la conducta pasada sobre la intención de reciclar. Medio ambiente y comportamiento humano, 6(1), 23-36.
Almeida, A., Vasconcelos, C. M., Strecht-Ribeiro, O., & Torres, J. (2013). Non-anthropocentric reasoning in children: Its incidence when they are confronted with ecological dilemmas. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 312-334. Doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.608387
Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2008). A survey on Turkish elementary school students’ environmental friendly behaviours and associated variables. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 129-143. Doi: 10.1080/1350-4620.802.051.747
Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J. I. Sevillano, V., & Cortés, B. (2005). La estructura de las creencias sobre la problemática medioambiental. Psicothema, 17(2), 257-262.
Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J. I., De Frutos, B., Sevillano, V., & Cortés, B. (2007). Underlying Dimensions of Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Environmental Beliefs. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 97-103.
Barraza, L. (2003). La formación de conceptos ambientales: el papel de los padres en la comunidad indígena San Juan de Parangaricutiro. Gaceta Ecológica, 66, 76-80.
Beatley, T. (2009). Biophilic urbanism: Inviting nature back to our communities and into our lives. William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 34(1), 209-238.
Berenguer, J. M. & Corraliza, J. A. (2000). Preocupación ambiental y comportamientos ecológicos. Psicothema, 12(3), 325-329.
Bezerra, S. (2011). Algunas propuestas sobre una nueva reflexión ética medioambiental. (Tesis de licenciatura). Universidad de Burgos, España. Recuperado de: http://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259.1/123/1/Bezerra.pdf
Boeve-DePauw, J., y Van Petegem, P. (2011). The effect of flemish eco-schools on student environmental knowledge, attitudes and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 33(11), 1513-1538. Doi: 10.1080/0950-0693.2010.540.725
Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (1997). Environmental perception of rural and urban pupils. Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 111-122. Doi: 10.1006/jevp.1997.0046
Campbell, L., & Wiesen, A. (2009). Restorative commons: creating health and well-being through urban landscapes (Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-39). Pennsylvania: U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Forest Service.
Carrier, S. J. (2009). Environmental education in the schoolyard: learning styles and gender. Environmental Education, 40(3), 2-12. Doi: 10.3200/JOEE .40.3.2-12
Cartró-Sabaté, M. M. (2011). Estudio comparativo de conocimientos y percepciones sobre la Reserva de la Biosfera de Sian Ka’an entre estudiantes de primaria de comunidades maya, México. (Tesis inédita de licenciatura). Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España. Recuperado de: http://ddd.uab.cat/ pub/trerecpro/2011/hdl_2072_171215/PFC_MariaMarCartroSabate.pdf
Castillo, A., Corral-Verdugo, V., González-Gaudiano, E., Paré, L., Paz, M. F., Reyes, J. & Schteingart, M. (2009). Conservación y Sociedad. En José Sarukhán (Ed.), Capital Natural de México, volumen II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio (pp. 761-801). México, D. F.: Conabio.
Castro-Cuéllar, A., Cruz-Burguete, J. L., & Ruiz-Montoya, L. (2009). Educar con ética y valores ambientales para conservar la naturaleza. Convergencia, 50, 353-382.
Catton, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 15-47. Doi: 10.1177/0002-7642.800.2400.103
Collado, S., Corraliza, J. A., Sorrel, M. A., & Evans, G. W. (2015). Spanish version of the children’s ecological behavior (CEB) scale. Psicothema, 27(1), 82-87. Doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.117
Corraliza, J. A., & Collado, S. (2011). La naturaleza cercana como moderadora del estrés infantil. Psicothema, 23(2), 221-226.
Corraliza, J. A., Collado, S., & Bethelmy, L. (2011). Effects of nearby nature on urban children’s stress. Asian Journal of Environment-Behavior studies, 2(4), 27-38.
Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Utah, USA: Gibbs Smith Publisher.
Drews, C. (2002). Attitudes, knowledge and wild animals as pets in Costa Rica. Anthrozoos, 15(2), 119-138. Doi: 10.2752/0892-7930.2786.9926.30
Eagles, P. F. J., & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. Environmental Education, 30(4), 33-37. Doi: 10.1080/0095.8969.9096.0188.2
Fernández-Caso, M. V. & Casas-Vilalta, M. (2004). Renovando los contenidos escolares: notas para abordar la relación sociedad-naturaleza desde la perspectiva de género. En María I. Vera Muñoz (Ed.), Formación de la ciudadanía: las TICs y los nuevos problemas (pp. 1-13). Alicante: Asociación Universitaria de Profesores de Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390-394. Doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
García-Mira, R., & Real-Deus, E. (2001). Valores, actitudes y creencias: hacia un modelo predictivo del ambientalismo. Medio ambiente y comportamiento humano, 2(1), 21-43.
Gerritsen, P. R. W., Montero, M., & Figueroa, P. (2003). El mundo en un espejo. Percepciones campesinas de los cambios ambientales en el Occidente de México. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 4(14), 253-278.
González-López, A. (2002). La preocupación por la calidad del medio ambiente. Un modelo cognitivo sobre la conducta ecológica. (Tesis de doctorado). Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España. Recuperado de: http://biblioteca. ucm.es/tesis/psi/ucm-t26479.pdf
Grinde, B., & Grindal-Patil, G. (2009). Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6, 2332-2343. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph6092332
Groenewegen, P.P., van den Berg, A.E., de Vries, S., & Verheij, R. A. (2006). Vitamin G: effects of Green space on health, well-being and social safety. BMC Public Health, 6(149), 1-9. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2458.614.9
Gudynas, E. (2004). Ecología, economía y ética del desarrollo sostenible (5a. ed.). Quito, Ecuador: Coscoroba.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8. Doi: 10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
Hoffman, A. J., & Sandelands, L. E. (2004). Getting right with nature: anthropocentrism, ecocentrism and theocentrism. Organization & Environment, 18(2), 1-22.
Iglesias-Forneiro, M. L. (2008). Observación y evaluación del ambiente de aprendizaje en educación infantil: dimensiones y variables a considerar. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 47, 49-70.
Kahn, P. H., & Friedman, B. (1995). Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city black community. Child Development, 66(5), 1403-1417. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00942.x
Kahriman-Ozturk, D., Olgan, R., & Tuncer, G. (2012). A qualitative study on Turkish preschool children’s environmental attitudes through ecocentrism and anthropocentrism. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 629-650. Doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.596228
Kellert, S. R. (1991). Japanese perceptions of wildlife. Conservation Biology, 5(3), 297-308.
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dillemmas. Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 261-272. Doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0205
Loughland, T., Reid, A., Walker, K., & Petocz, P. (2003). Factors Influencing Young People’s Conceptions of Environment. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 3-19. Doi: 10.1080/1350-4620.303.471
Lundmark, C. (2007). The new ecological paradigm revisited: anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 329-347. Doi: 10.1080/1350-4620.701.430.448
Maneja-Zaragoza, R.. (2010). La percepción del medio ambiente en grupos infantiles y adolescentes: Comparativa entre la Huacana (Michoacán, México) y la cuenca del río Tordera (NE, Cataluña). (Tesis de doctorado) Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España. Recuperado de: https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/ imprimirFicheroTesis.do?fichero=19731
Martimportugués, C., Canto, J. M., García, M. A. & Hidalgo, C. (2002). Actitudes hacia el ahorro de agua: un análisis descriptivo. Medio ambiente y comportamiento humano, 3(2), 119-143.
Moncada, J. A., Aranguren, J., Díaz, E., & Alonso, E. (2004). Aproximación a la dimensión afectiva de las actitudes hacia los animales en visitantes del Parque Zoológico Caricuao. Caracas, Venezuela. Revista de Investigación IPC-UPEL, 55, 101-131.
Ozdemir, A., & Yilmaz, O. (2008). Assessment of outdoor school environments and physical activity in Ankara’s primary schools. Environmental Psychology, 28, 287-300. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.004
Páramo, P., & Mejía, M. A. (2004). Los parques urbanos como oportunidades para la interacción de los niños con los animales. Latinoamericana de Psicología, 36(1), 73-84.
Pereyra, A. (1999). La fragmentación de la oferta educativa: la educación pública vs la educación privada (Boletín No. 08). Buenos Aires: IIPE-UNESCO, Sistema de Información de Tendencias Educativas en América Latina.
Pérez-Miranda, I., & Carbó-García, J. R. (2010). Juegos de rol y roles de género. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 11(3), 168-184.
Priego-González, C., Breuste, J. H., & Rojas-Hernández, J. (2010). Espacios naturales en zonas urbanas. Análisis comparado de la ciudad alemana de Halle y las chilenas de San Pedro de la Paz y Talcahuano. Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS), 86(1), 199-224. Doi: 10.3989/ris.2008.05.14
Programa Estado de la Nación. (2015). Quinto Informe Estado de la Educación. San José, Costa Rica: Programa Estado de la Nación.
Quesada-Guerrero, R. (2010). Empoderamiento de mujeres latinoamericanas a través de prácticas ecofeministas. Investigaciones feministas, 1, 97-109.
Rozzi, R. (2007). De las ciencias ecológicas a la ética ambiental. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 80(4), 521-534. Doi: 10.4067/S0716-078X.2007.0004.00012
Sandell, K., & Öhman, J. (2010). Educational potentials of encounters with nature: reflections from a Swedish outdoor perspective. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 113-132. Doi: 10.1080/1350-4620.903.504.065
Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: an analysis. Environmental Education, 17(2), 31-40. Doi: 10.1080/00958964.1986.9941408
Stenmark, M. (2002). The relevance of environmental ethical theories for policy making. Environmental Ethics, 24(2), 135-148. Doi: 10.5840/enviroethics.2002. 242.27.
Strife, S. J.. (2012). Children environmental concerns: Expressing ecophobia. Environmental Education, 43(1), 37-54. Doi: 10.1080/0095.8964.2011.602131
Szagun, G., & Mesenholl, E. (1993). Environmental ethics: an empirical study of west german adolescents. Environmental Education, 25(1), 37-44. Doi: 10.1080/00958964.1993.9941943
Tafalla, M. (2005). Por una estética de la naturaleza: la belleza natural como argumento ecologista. Isegoría, 32, 215-226. Doi: 10.3989/isegoria.2005.i32.445
Tsunoda, T. (2007). Visual and emotional environmental interpretation of landscapes and nature scenes by american and Japanese elementary school children. (Tesis de maestría). Kansas State University, Estados Unidos. Recuperado de http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/489/Tomoko Tsunoda2007.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Van Petegem, P., & Blieck, A. (2006). The environmental worldview of children: a cross-cultural perspective. Environmental Education Research, 12(5), 625-635.
Villuendas, M. D., Liébana, J. A., Fernández, R., & Córdoba, F. (2005). Representaciones ecológicas en la infancia y estilos de vida. Educar, 36, 13-30.
Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environmental and Behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311-330. Doi: 10.1177/0013916503251445
Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1-24.
Westphal, L. M. (2003). Urban greening and social benefits: a study of empowerment outcomes. Journal of Arboriculture, 29(3), 137-147.
White, R. (2006). Young children’s relationship with nature: Its importance to children’s development & the earth’s future. Taproot, 16(2), 1-10. Recuperado de https://www.whitehutchinson.com/children/articles/childrennature.shtml
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443-457. Doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 UNED Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.